脊柱内镜下腰椎融合术后患者运动恐惧变化轨迹及预测因素分析

Trajectories of kinesiophobia and predictive factors in patients after endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion

  • 摘要: 目的:探讨脊柱内镜下腰椎融合术后患者运动恐惧变化轨迹及其预测因素。方法:应用便利抽样法,选取2024年4月至2025年9月在广西中医药大学第一附属医院接受脊柱内镜下腰椎融合术患者278例为研究对象,应用一般资料调查问卷、坦帕运动恐惧症量表(Tampa scale for kinesiophobia,TSK)、疼痛视觉模拟评分表(visual analogue scale,VAS)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(Oswestry disability index,ODI)、电子健康素养量表(eHealth literacy scale,eHEALS)、慢性疼痛自我效能感量表(chronic pain self-efficacy scale,CPSS)和Groningen骨科社会支持量表(Groningen orthopaedic social support scale,GO-SSS)进行基线调查,并应用TSK调查患者术后首次离床活动时、术后2周、术后1个月及术后3个月的运动恐惧水平。利用潜变量增长混合模型(latent growth mixture model,LGMM)分析患者术后运动恐惧的潜在轨迹类别,采用无序多分类logistic回归分析探究潜在类别相关影响因素。结果:完成研究的263例患者在术后首次离床活动时、术后2周、术后1个月、术后3个月的TSK总分分别为(41.85±6.48)分、(38.17±6.93)分、(36.13±6.27)分、(33.89±5.95)分,呈逐渐降低趋势(P<0.001)。LGMM评价显示,术后运动恐惧发展轨迹类别数目为3时模型拟合最优,患者可分为持续高运动恐惧组(C1组,n=86,占32.70%)、中运动恐惧下降组(C2组,n=74,占28.14%)和低运动恐惧下降组(C3组,n=103,占39.16%)。无序多分类logistic回归分析发现,以C3组为参照,家庭人均月收入、VAS评分、eHEALS评分和CPSS评分是患者归入C2组的影响因素,家庭人均月收入、查尔森合并症指数评分、VAS评分、ODI评分、eHEALS评分、CPSS评分和GO-SSS评分是患者归入C1组的影响因素(P<0.05)。结论:脊柱内镜下腰椎融合术后患者运动恐惧变化轨迹可分为持续高运动恐惧、中运动恐惧下降和低运动恐惧下降3种类别,其影响因素多样,临床应依据不同轨迹类别的特点予以针对性干预。

     

    Abstract: Objective: To explore the trajectories of kinesiophobia and predictive factors in patients after endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion. Methods: Using convenience sampling method, 278 patients who underwent endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine from April 2024 to September 2025 were enrolled as participants. A general information questionnaire, the Tampa scale for kinesiophobia(TSK), visual analogue scale(VAS), Oswestry disability index(ODI), eHealth literacy scale(eHEALS), chronic pain self-efficacy scale(CPSS), and Groningen orthopaedic social support scale(GOSSS) were used for baseline investigation. The TSK was used to assess patients' kinesiophobia levels at the time of postoperative ambulation, and at 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months after surgery. Latent growth mixture model(LGMM) was used to analyze the latent trajectory classes of postoperative kinesiophobia in patients. Multinomial logistic regression analysis was used to explore the influencing factors related to latent classes. Results: Among the 263 patients who completed the study, the total TSK scores at the time of postoperative ambulation, and at 2 weeks, 1 month and 3 months postoperatively were(41.85±6.48) points,(38.17±6.93) points,(36.13±6.27) points, and(33.89±5.95) points, respectively, showing a gradual decreasing trend(P<0.001). LGMM evaluation indicated that the 3-class model of postoperative kinesiophobia trajectories provided the best fit, and the patients were categorized into 3 classes: the persistent high kinesiophobia group(group C1, n=86, accounting for 32.70%), the moderate-decreasing kinesiophobia group(group C2, n=74, accounting for 28.14%), and the low-decreasing kinesiophobia group(group C3, n=103, accounting for 39.16%). Multinomial logistic regression analysis revealed that, with Group C3 as the reference, monthly household income per capita, VAS score, eHEALS score and CPSS score were influencing factors for patients being classified into group C2. Monthly household income per capita, Charlson comorbidity index, VAS score, ODI score, eHEALS score, CPSS score and GO-SSS score were influencing factors for patients being classified into group C1(P<0.05). Conclusion: The trajectories of kinesiophobia in patients after endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion can be classified into persistent high kinesiophobia, moderate-decreasing kinesiophobia and low-decreasing kinesiophobia. These trajectories are influenced by multiple factors; therefore, targeted clinical interventions should be delivered based on the characteristics of different trajectory classes.

     

/

返回文章
返回