克拉霉素联合抗真菌药物作用于马尔尼菲篮状菌的体外药敏研究

In vitro susceptibility study of clarithromycin combined with antifungal agents against Talaromyces marneffei

  • 摘要: 目的:评估克拉霉素(clarithromycin,CLA)与4种抗真菌药物对马尔尼菲篮状菌(Talaromyces marneffei,TM)的体外联合效应,并比较不同判读标准对联合药敏结果的影响,为临床治疗TM和非结核分枝杆菌(nontuberculous mycobacteria,NTM)合并感染提供理论依据。方法:采用棋盘格法,对20株TM(19株临床株+1株标准株)进行CLA与两性霉素B(amphotericin B,AmB)、氟康唑(fluconazole,FLC)、伊曲康唑(itraconazole,ITC)、伏立康唑(voriconazole,VOC)的联合药敏实验。唑类药物分别采用50%抑制浓度(IC50)与完全抑制浓度(IC100)两种判读标准,使用部分抑制浓度指数(fractional inhibitory concentration index,FICI)判定联合效应。结果:AmB+CLA协同率最高(18/20,90%),联合后AmB的IC100几何均数从2.297μg/mL降至0.536μg/mL(P<0.001)。ITC+CLA在两种判读标准下均表现稳定(协同率45%~65%,相加率35%~55%)。FLC和VOC联合CLA的效应高度依赖判读标准:IC50判读时以无关作用为主(100%和85%),IC100判读时转变为相加作用为主(85%和75%)。所有组合均未观察到拮抗作用。结论:AmB+CLA协同效应最强,提示其可能作为重症合并感染联合治疗的潜在优选方案;ITC联合CLA效应稳定,提示其具有适用于口服序贯治疗的潜力;FLC和VOC联合CLA需达到完全抑制浓度方能体现联合优势。判读标准的选择可显著影响唑类药物联合药敏的定性结论。

     

    Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the in vitro combined effects of clarithromycin(CLA) with 4 antifungal agents against Talaromyces marneffei(TM), and to compare the impacts of different interpretive criteria on the combined susceptibility results, thereby providing a theoretical basis for the clinical treatment of co-infection caused by TM and nontuberculous mycobacteria(NTM). Methods: The checkerboard microdilution method was adopted to perform the combination susceptibility testing of CLA with amphotericin B(AmB), fluconazole(FLC), itraconazole(ITC) and voriconazole(VOC) against 20 TM strains(19 clinical isolates+1 reference strain). For azoles, 2 interpretive criteria were respectively adopted: half-maximal inhibitory concentration(IC50) and complete-inhibitory concentration(IC100), and the combined effects were assessed using fractional inhibitory concentration index(FICI). Results: The combination of AmB and CLA showed the highest synergy rate(18/20, 90%), and the geometric mean of IC100 of AmB decreased from 2.297 μg/mL to 0.536 μg/mL after the combination(P<0.001). The combination of ITC and CLA showed consistent activity under both interpretive criteria, with synergy rates of 45%-65% and additive rates of 35%-55%. The synergistic effects of the FLC-CLA and VOC-CLA combinations were highly dependent on the interpretive criteria: indifferent interactions predominated at IC50(100% and 85%, respectively), whereas additive interactions predominated at IC100(85% and 75%, respectively). No antagonism was observed for any combination. Conclusion: The combination of AmB and CLA exhibits the strongest synergistic effect, suggesting its potential as a preferred option for combined therapy in severe co-infections. The combination of ITC and CLA exhibits a stable synergistic effect, suggesting its potential for oral sequential therapy. The synergistic effects of the FLC-CLA and VOC-CLA combinations can only be observed at IC100. The choice of interpretive criteria significantly affects the qualitative outcomes of azolecombination susceptibility testing.

     

/

返回文章
返回