基于体外细胞实验及网络药理学初步探讨柴胡皂苷A对糖尿病肾病的作用及其机制

Preliminary study on the effects and mechanisms of Saikosaponin A on diabetic nephropathy based on in vitro cell experiments and network pharmacology

  • 摘要: 目的: 基于体外细胞实验、网络药理学和分子对接探讨柴胡皂苷A(SSA)对糖尿病肾病(DN)的作用及其可能的分子机制。方法: 取大鼠肾小管上皮细胞NRK-52E,通过MTT测定SSA的细胞毒性,筛选SSA安全浓度并检测其对高糖(HG)诱导的细胞活性氧(ROS)水平的影响。Western blotting法检测纤维化相关指标FN蛋白表达。基于Swiss Target Prediction平台、UniProt数据库及TCMSP数据库,筛选SSA作用靶点;通过OMIM数据库与GeneCards数据库联用,筛选DN靶点。采用韦恩图获取两者交集靶点,运用STRING数据库构建蛋白相互作用(PPI)网络,Cytoscape 3.9.1软件行可视化分析,筛选核心靶点;DAVID平台行GO和KEGG富集分析,再利用Cytoscape 3.9.1软件构建SSA—关键靶点—通路—DN网络图,CB-Dock2完成药物—靶点分子对接,RT-qPCR验证SSA可能作用的靶点。结果: ≤8 μmol/L SSA对NRK-52E细胞无明显毒性作用(P>0.05),0.5 μmol/L SSA对HG诱导的NRK-52E细胞ROS过度产生抑制作用最明显(P<0.05),1 μmol/L SSA能显著抑制HG诱导的FN上调(P<0.05)。SSA抗DN的潜在作用靶点共35个,排名前5的核心靶点为EGFR、MYC、STAT3、CASP3和JUN。与SSA抗DN机制相关的信号通路主要有PI3K-AKT、AGE-RAGE、EGFR等。SSA与EGFR、MYC、STAT3、CASP3、JUN具有较好的结合作用(结合能小于-5 kcal/mol)。SSA能降低EGFR、MYC、STAT3、CASP3JUN mRNA表达水平(P<0.05)。结论: SSA能够抑制HG诱导的ROS过度产生和FN异常表达,从而改善NRK-52E细胞损伤;SSA抗DN机制可能与调节EGFR、MYC、STAT3、CASP3、JUN等靶点及PI3K-AKT、AGE-RAGE、EGFR等信号通路有关。

     

    Abstract: Objective: To investigate the effects of Saikosaponin A (SSA) on diabetic nephropathy (DN) and its possible molecular mechanisms based on in vitro cell experiments, network pharmacology and molecular docking. Methods: Rat renal tubular epithelial cells (NRK-52E) were used as the research subject. The cytotoxicity of SSA was determined by MTT assay, and the safe concentration of SSA was screened and its effects on the level of reactive oxygen species (ROS) induced by high glucose (HG) was detected. Western blotting was used to analyze the effects of SSA on the expression of FN protein. In network pharmacology part, SSA targets were screened based on Swiss Target Prediction platform, UniProt and TCMSP databases. Through the combination of OMIM database and GeneCards database, the targets of DN were screened. Venn diagram was used to obtain the intersection targets of the two, and STRING database was used to construct a protein-protein interaction (PPI) analysis network. Cytoscape 3.9.1 software was used for visual analysis to screen the core targets. The DAVID platform was used for GO functional enrichment analysis and KEGG enrichment analysis, and Cytoscape 3.9.1 software was used to construct the SSA-key targets-pathways-DN network. CB-Dock2 was used to complete drug-target molecular docking. Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was used to verify the possible targets of SSA. Results: The results showed that SSA≤8 μmol/L had no obvious toxic effects on NRK-52E cells (P>0.05). SSA at 0.5 μmol/L had the most significant inhibitory effects on HG-induced ROS overproduction in NRK-52E cells (P<0.05), and SSA at 1 μmol/L significantly inhibited HG-induced upregulation of FN (P<0.05). The results of network pharmacology showed that there were 35 potential targets of SSA against DN. The top five core targets included epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), MYC proto-oncogene (MYC), signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), caspase 3 (CASP3) and Jun proto-oncogene (JUN). GO function and KEGG enrichment analysis showed that the signaling pathways related to the anti-DN mechanisms of SSA were mainly phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-protein kinase B (PI3K-AKT), advanced glycation end products-receptor for AGE (AGE-RAGE) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR); molecular docking results showed that SSA had a good binding interaction with EGFR, MYC, STAT3, CASP3 and JUN (the binding energy was less than -5 kcal·mol), and could reduce the mRNA levels of EGFR, MYC, STAT3, CASP3 and JUN (P<0.05). Conclusion: SSA can inhibit the excessive production of ROS and abnormal expression of FN induced by HG, thereby alleviating the damage of NRK-52E cells. The anti-DN mechanisms of SSA may be related to the regulation of EGFR, MYC, STAT3, CASP3, JUN and other targets and PI3K-AKT, AGE-RAGE and EGFR signaling pathways.

     

/

返回文章
返回