输血依赖型地中海贫血的ex vivoin vivo基因治疗的策略与实践

Strategies and practices of ex vivo and in vivo gene therapy for transfusion-dependent thalassemia

  • 摘要: 地中海贫血是由α-珠蛋白基因或β-珠蛋白基因发生突变或缺失,导致α-珠蛋白链或β-珠蛋白链合成减少或完全缺失而引起的一种遗传性溶血性疾病。部分中间型和重型地中海贫血患者主要依赖输血治疗,但长期输血会导致慢性铁过载,进而引发危及生命的并发症。同种异体造血干细胞(HSC)移植是一种能够治愈输血依赖型地中海贫血(TDT)的疗法,但是大多数患者缺乏匹配的供体。采用慢病毒载体携带α-珠蛋白基因或β-珠蛋白基因转导或经过基因编辑的自体HSC回输至患者的回体(ex vivo)基因治疗,已成为一种根治TDT的替代疗法。目前大部分TDT临床试验都是采用ex vivo基因治疗,但其存在清髓处理对患者身体有损伤、个体化治疗费用高、治疗过程操作复杂、质量控制难度大等缺点。TDT体内(in vivo)基因治疗是在体内靶向HSC直接进行修饰或编辑,是极具潜力的治疗策略,但是开发高效且安全的递送系统等方面仍面临挑战。本文综述了当前TDT ex vivo基因治疗相关临床试验的进展,以及用于实现in vivo基因治疗的递送载体,包括病毒载体、脂质纳米颗粒(LNP)和病毒样颗粒(VLP),系统比较各类方法的优势与局限,并展望未来技术优化的方向。

     

    Abstract: Thalassemia is a hereditary hemolytic disorder caused by mutation or deletion in the α-globin gene or β-globin gene, leading to reduced or completely absent synthesis of α-globin peptide chain or β-globin peptide chain. Patients with moderate to severe thalassemia are predominantly dependent on regular blood transfusion therapy; however, this life-sustaining treatment inevitably leads to chronic iron overload, which may progress to potentially fatal complications. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell(HSC) transplantation is a curative option for transfusion-dependent thalassemia(TDT); however, the majority of patients do not have access to HLA-matched donors. Ex vivo gene therapy, employing lentiviral vectors to deliver functional α-or β-globin gene or gene editing autologous HSC, followed by reinfusion into patients, has emerged as a promising alternative curative approach for TDT. While ex vivo gene therapy remains the predominant strategy in current clinical trials, this approach presents several limita-tions, including the adverse effects of myeloablative conditioning regimens, high costs associated with personal-ized manufacturing, intricate logistical requirements, and stringent quality control challenges. In vivo gene therapy for TDT, involving direct modification or gene editing of HSC within the patient’s body, represents a highly promising therapeutic strategy. However, this approach still faces challenges in developing efficient and safe delivery systems. This article reviews recent advances in clinical trials of ex vivo gene therapy for TDT and evaluates various delivery vector systems for in vivo gene therapy, including viral vectors, lipid nanoparticles(LNP), and virus-like particles(VLP). We provide a systematic comparison of their respective advantages and limitations, while discussing potential future directions for technological optimization in this field.

     

/

返回文章
返回